On appeal to the court, Google filed a coexistence agreement on the trial appeal. As usual, the General Court upheld the TRAB`s decisions and decided that, even if the parties had agreed on coexistence, if two marks were identical or similar and related to identical or similar products, the latter would be refused registration in order to maintain market design and avoid confusion among consumers. In the second appeal, trab`s decision was accepted a second time. In China, there is no codified or legal basis for how TRABs and courts should deal with consent or coexistence agreement between the parties. Google Inc. received an agreement from Shimano, which accepted the coexistence of its “NEXUS” brand with the Google brand. .